Search Flickr Better With Google Images. At a for profit editorial outlet like Lifehacker, when we need an image for our posts, we cant just do a Google image search and slap up the first result. We have to use properly licensed photos. Sometimes we use our own original photos, sometimes Getty images that we pay for, sometimes the millions of Flickr photos licensed for free use through Creative Commons. But since 2. 01. 4, Google Images has also let users filter photos by license. And unlike Flickr, Google Images uses the most sophisticated search algorithms on the planet. So it can unearth some Flickr photos that even Flickr cant. For a recent post, I needed a hero shot of hand towels. Hot Bizzle City Business Classifieds Marketplace offers business automobile electronics fashion household jobs ads realestate list deals shopping s. From Avast Software Lightweight, stateoftheart protection that wont slow down your PC. Avast Free Antivirus has been redesigned to be easier to use while staying. Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' title='Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' />Searching hand towels on Flickr returned a lot of hands near and around towels, plus the usual Second Life screenshots and NSFW art. Flickr just knew I wanted content about hands and towels. But Google guessed that my phrasing mattered, and found more actual hand towels, like the beautiful red and yellow number in my post. Flickr knew that was a picture of a towel, but it couldnt recognize the hand part, since that word appeared nowhere on the images main page. Googles AI algorithms may have literally recognized this was a hand towel, or maybe Google just knew that other sites had linked or embedded the image with the relevant phrase. Either way, it dug up an image that hadnt been explicitly labeled, but was exactly what I needed. Game Maker Furniture Sprites. IIoxCMmswpY/UyU3RKQ4eTI/AAAAAAAABKg/VQsGur_QmoY/s1600/avg-2014-free1.png' alt='Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' title='Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' />I have recommendations for specific security software and techniques in various places on the site. Heres a short summary. Pros Cleaner interface IObit Uninstaller 5 improves upon version 4 with a sidebar showing you a variety of things you can remove, for easier navigation and. Latest trending topics being covered on ZDNet including Reviews, Tech Industry, Security, Hardware, Apple, and Windows. So for any tricky image searches, you still might want to dig into Googles Tools menu before trying a specialized engine. Google Images will filter images by size, color, recency, license, or even pick out photos, faces, line drawings, animations, or clip art. If youre searching by license, youll still need to click through from the Google result to the images original page, to confirm the license and follow any restrictions, like giving attribution. Googles powerful, but its not perfect, and you cant blame it when someone comes at you for using their photo without following the rules. TheINQUIRER publishes daily news, reviews on the latest gadgets and devices, and INQdepth articles for tech buffs and hobbyists. Microsoft Security Essentials helps guard your PC against viruses, spyware, and other malicious software. Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' title='Avg Internet Security 2011 License Number Crack - Reviews 2017' />We Asked Five Security Experts If Smart Locks Are Ever Safe. An automatic firmware update broke Lock. States internet enabled smart locks for around 5. Airbnb hosts who use the locks to remotely manage rental access. Customers have to replace their locks or ship them back for repairs. Kaspersky Lab develops and markets antivirus, internet security, password management, endpoint security, and other cybersecurity products and services. It is the. InformationWeek. News, analysis and research for business technology professionals, plus peertopeer knowledge sharing. Engage with our community. The locks can still be operated with a physical key. Smart locks, like so many Internet of Things devices, are vulnerable to a host of tech issues. Last year security consultant Anthony Rose revealed huge security flaws in Bluetooth enabled door locks. Of the 1. 6 locks he tested, Rose managed to break into 1. Smart locks dont seem any more foolproof than when our sister site Gizmodo explored smart lock security four years ago. We asked five security experts whether these locks are fundamentally insecure. None of these experts is ready to entirely write off all smart locks. Like so much of technology, you simply have to decide who to trust and how much to trust them, says security technologist, author, and Harvard lecturer Bruce Schneier, who testified before Congress last year about the catastrophic risks of insecure internet enabled devices. There is always a risk that a net enabled lock will get bricked or hacked, says MIT professor Stuart Madnick, most likely due to the actions or carelessness of the owner. But he points out that old fashioned key and lock solutions have their own user created risks One of my popular sayings is You may buy a stronger lock for your door, but if you still leave the key under the mat, are you really any more secureMadnick compares the trade off to the increased risks of driving a car instead of a horse. Are you willing to trade your car in for a horseJeremiah Grossman, Chief of Security Strategy at cybersecurity firm Sentinel. One, compares smart locks to older remote systems like prison security doors and receptionist controlled buzzers. He says internet connected locks can sometimes be an appropriate solution Would I personally entrust the security of my home to such a device Not at the moment, but in the future as the devices get better and more secure I might trust them more. Should others use them Sure, depending on their living situation. And people might consider using them for doorways where what theyre securing isnt critically important to them. Thats one hell of a caveat for a 4. Grossman recently tweeted about deeper implications of an insecure smart lock update system But Grossman says we shouldnt ask whether smart locks are fundamentally insecure but whether they are secure enough for a given application. Alan Grau, co founder of security software provider Icon Labs, puts it similarly There is no question people are going to use smart locks despite the risks. I think the questions to be asked are not if these solutions should be used, but rather what are the risks How do these risks compare to traditional locks What can lock makers do to ensure that a reasonable layer of security is built into these devicesSecurity reporter Brian Krebs had the harshest words, saying it bothers him that so many people are installing smart locks. To break through a lock, he says, an attacker has always had to be on site. With internet enabled locks, youve removed that expensive and from an attackers perspective, risky cost from the equation. He still wont write off the technology entirely. I am not saying there cant be remotely enabled locks that are also secure. But Id wager on balance that most of those in use today are probably nowhere near as secure as they should be. With all these caveats, the consensus seems to be that smart locks trade off a lot of expected security for more convenience. Before you buy a smart lock, research its known security issues, and know that new ones could crop up. But remember that if you use it wrong, any lock is insecure.